裝備指揮領(lǐng)域軍事碩士研究生英語(yǔ)
定 價(jià):26 元
叢書名:軍隊(duì)“2110工程”建設(shè)項(xiàng)目·軍事裝備學(xué)
- 作者:白宇 ,張景臣 編
- 出版時(shí)間:2010/4/1
- ISBN:9787118067811
- 出 版 社:國(guó)防工業(yè)出版社
- 中圖法分類:H31
- 頁(yè)碼:176
- 紙張:膠版紙
- 版次:1
- 開(kāi)本:16開(kāi)
《裝備指揮領(lǐng)域軍事碩士研究生英語(yǔ)》針對(duì)裝備指揮領(lǐng)域軍事碩士的特點(diǎn),所選課文及閱讀文章均選自近幾年國(guó)外相關(guān)報(bào)道及期刊雜志上的文章,專業(yè)性強(qiáng)、內(nèi)容新穎、語(yǔ)言規(guī)范、難易適中。對(duì)課文的單詞、語(yǔ)言點(diǎn)及相關(guān)背景知識(shí)都有詳盡的注釋,并在文章后配有譯文。共分14個(gè)單元,每個(gè)單元包括Part A正課文,Part B副課文,用來(lái)擴(kuò)充閱讀量和詞匯。
本教材不僅適用于裝備指揮領(lǐng)域軍事碩士研究生,也可以作為軍事類其他領(lǐng)域軍事碩士研究生的選用教材。
為了總結(jié)梳理軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)成果,提升軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)水平和裝備人才培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量,在軍隊(duì)“2110工程”專項(xiàng)經(jīng)費(fèi)支持下,在裝備指揮技術(shù)學(xué)院“2110工程”教材(著作)編審委員會(huì)統(tǒng)一組織指導(dǎo)下,軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科領(lǐng)域的專家學(xué)者編著了一批適應(yīng)裝備人才培養(yǎng)需求,對(duì)我軍裝備工作具有主要指導(dǎo)作用的軍事裝備學(xué)系列叢書,將分別以軍事裝備學(xué)的學(xué)術(shù)專著和專業(yè)教材的形式陸續(xù)出版。
在總裝首長(zhǎng)、機(jī)關(guān)和軍事裝備學(xué)專家學(xué)者的共同努力下,軍事裝備學(xué)走過(guò)了從無(wú)到有、從小到大、從弱到強(qiáng)的快速發(fā)展歷程,建立了軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科體系,創(chuàng)立了軍事裝備學(xué)理論,獲得了多項(xiàng)國(guó)家級(jí)和軍隊(duì)級(jí)獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),培養(yǎng)了一大批“指技俱精”的高素質(zhì)的裝備人才,造就了一支具有較高學(xué)科理論素養(yǎng)和豐富實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)隊(duì)伍,為我軍軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)和裝備人才培養(yǎng)作出了巨大貢獻(xiàn)。
作為軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)繼往開(kāi)來(lái)的一件大事,編輯這套叢書是軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)的重要內(nèi)容,是裝備人才培養(yǎng)的重要基礎(chǔ),也是體現(xiàn)軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)水平的重要標(biāo)志。它承擔(dān)著記載與弘揚(yáng)軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科成就、積累和傳播軍事裝備學(xué)知識(shí)的使命,是眾多軍事裝備學(xué)專家學(xué)者辛勤汗水的結(jié)晶。編著這套叢書,旨在系統(tǒng)全面地將實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)一步理論化、科學(xué)化,形成具有我軍特色的軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科知識(shí)體系。一是總結(jié)軍事裝備學(xué)學(xué)科建設(shè)和裝備人才培養(yǎng)的理論研究與實(shí)踐探索的重要成果和寶貴經(jīng)驗(yàn),將專家學(xué)者的思考、觀點(diǎn)和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)歸納總結(jié)出來(lái),以利于軍事裝備學(xué)知識(shí)的積累和傳承;二是緊緊圍繞我軍武器裝備現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)和軍事斗爭(zhēng)裝備準(zhǔn)備,以裝備指揮、裝備管理、裝備保障和裝備采辦為主要內(nèi)容,為軍事裝備學(xué)任職培訓(xùn)提供一套系統(tǒng)、全面的教學(xué)用書。
Unit 1
Part A Service Acquisition Organization
Part B Supplementary Reading: Army Organization of the United States
Unit 2
Part A Revised US Nuclear Doctrine Outlines Preemption Strategy
Part B Supplementary Reading: Preemptive Strikes Part of U S Strategic Doctrine "All Options" Open for Countering Unconventional Arms
Unit 3
Part A Bush Declares War on Iraq
Part B Supplementary Reading:The Normandy Landings
Unit 4
Part A Information Superiority
Part B Supplementary Reading: GIG
Unit 5
Part A The Future Combat System
Part B Supplementary Reading: AH-64A/D Apache Attack Helicopter
Unit 6
Part A Air Force Special Operations Forces
Part B Supplementary Reading : C - 130 Hercules
Unit 7
Part A Aircraft Carrier
Part B Supplementary Reading: Air Anti -Submarine Warfare
Unit 8
Part A Patriot Missile Air Defense System of USA
Part B Supplementary Reading: MEADS: Medium Extended AirDefense System
Unit 9
Part A Life Cycle Management: Integrating Acquisition and Sustainment "
Part B Supplementary Reading: Lockheed Focused on Total Life-Cycle Support of Aircraft
Unit 10
Part A Contractors on the Battlefield in the 21st Century
Part B Supplementary Reading: Introduction of Prefabricated Harbors in WWII
Unit 11
Part A What Is Network- Centric Warfare?
Part B Supplementary Reading: Psychological- Information Warfare: Lessons of Afghanistan
Unit 12
Part A Statement by Mr Hu Xiaodi, Ambassador for Disarmament Affairs of China, at the Plenary of the 2004 Session of the Conference on Disarmament (section)
Part B Supplementary Reading: Export controls, arms and military equipment exports introduction of the Republic of Belarus in 2001/2002
Unit 13
Part A RFID Technology: Is the Capability A Boon or Burdon for DOD7
Part B Supplementary Reading: Savi Technology Deploys New Mobile
RFID Infrastructure Kit for Real -Time Visibility of Military Supplies
Unit 14
Part A Military Operations other than War
Part B Supplementary Reading:Non-I~thal Weapons for Military
Operations Other Than War
譯文及答案
附錄1 軍語(yǔ)詞匯
附錄2 英美軍銜表
ROYAL NAVY(RN)英國(guó)皂家海軍
United States Navy(USN)美國(guó)海軍
British Army英國(guó)陸軍
United States Army美國(guó)陸軍
Royal Air Force(RAF)英國(guó)皇家空軍
United States Air Force(USAF)美國(guó)空軍
Royal Marines(EM)英國(guó)皇家海軍陸戰(zhàn)隊(duì)
United States Marine Corps(USMC)美國(guó)海軍陸戰(zhàn)隊(duì)
附錄3 裝備部門英譯及部分與裝備研究相關(guān)單位對(duì)外名稱
附錄4 個(gè)人簡(jiǎn)歷的寫法
附錄5 摘要的寫法
At a White House briefing that year, a spokesman said the United States would "respond with overwhelming force" to the use of weapons of mass destruction againstthe United States, its forces, or allies, and said" all options" would be available tcthe president.
The draft, dated March 15, would provide authoritative guidance for com-manders to request presidential approval for using nuclear weapons, and represent.,the Pentagons first attempt to revise procedures to reflect the Bush preemption doc-trine. A previous version, completed in 1995 during the Clinton administration, con-tains no mention of using nuclear weapons preemptively or specifically against threatsfrom weapons of mass destruction.
Titled "Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations" and written under the direction otAir Force General Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the draf!document is unclassified and available on a Pentagon website. It is expected to besigned within a few weeks by Air Force Lieutenant General Norton A. Schwartz, di-rector of the Joint Staff, according to Navy Commander Dawn Cutler, a public affairsofficer in Myerss office. Meanwhile, the draft is going through final coordination withthe military services, the combatant commanders, Pentagon legal authorities, andRumsfelds office, Cutler said in a written statement.
A" summary of changes" included in the draft identifies differences from the1995 doctrine and says the new document "revises the discussion of nuclear weaponsuse across the range of military operations. "
The first example for potential nuclear weapon use listed in the draft is againstan enemy that is using" or intending to use WMD" against US or allied, multinationalmilitary forces or civilian populations.
Another scenario for a possible nuclear preemptive strike is in case of an"immi-nent attack from adversary biological weapons that only effects from nuclear weaponscan safely destroy. "
That and other provisions in the document appear to refer to nuclear initiativesproposed by the administration that Congress has thus far declined to fully support.
The Joint Staff draft doctrine explains that despite the end of the Cold War, theproliferation of weapons of mass destruction " raises the danger of nuclearweapons use.