新聞學(xué)與傳播學(xué)經(jīng)典叢書·英文原版系列:個(gè)性動力論(英文版)
定 價(jià):39 元
叢書名: 新聞學(xué)與傳播學(xué)經(jīng)典叢書·英文原版系列
- 作者:[美] 庫特·盧因(Kurt Lewin) 著;展江,保道寬 編
- 出版時(shí)間:2013/9/1
- ISBN:9787565707711
- 出 版 社:中國傳媒大學(xué)出版社
- 中圖法分類:B848
- 頁碼:348
- 紙張:膠版紙
- 版次:1
- 開本:32開
The present book is a collection of originally independent articles which were written at different times and for quite different occasions. Hence,the reader will find some of the fundamental i-deas recurring throughout the book. The selection has been made in order to give a picture of the fields thus far studied,the psy-chology of the person and of the environment,ancl at the same time to inclicate their connections with the various applied fields,
especially child psychology, pedagogy, psychopathology, charac-terology,and social psychology.
Only a few years ago one could observe,at least among Ger-man psychologists,a quite pessimistic mood. After the initial suc-cesses of experimental psychology in its early stages, it seemed to become clearer and clearer that it would remain impossible for ex-perimental method to press on beyond the psychology of perception and memory to such vital problems as those with which psychoanalysis was concerned. Weighty "philosophical" and"method-ological" considerations seemed to make such an undertaking apriori impossible.
《新聞學(xué)與傳播學(xué)經(jīng)典叢書·英文原版系列:個(gè)性動力論(英文版)》將格式塔心理學(xué)原理用于研究動機(jī)、人格及團(tuán)體社會歷程!
作者系傳播學(xué)奠基人之一!
前言
譯者前言
第一章 亞里士多德和伽利略思維模式在當(dāng)代心理學(xué)中的沖
第二章 意識的結(jié)構(gòu)
第三章 環(huán)境在兒童行為及發(fā)展中的作用
第四章 獎(jiǎng)懲對應(yīng)的心理狀態(tài)
第五章 基于現(xiàn)實(shí)的教育
第六章 替代活動及其價(jià)值
第七章 低能的動力學(xué)理論
第八章 實(shí)驗(yàn)性調(diào)查測評
人名索引
關(guān)鍵詞索引
Aristotelicrn Concepts
Fortuitousness o f the Individual Case. The concept forma-tion of psychology is dominated,just as was that of Aristotelianphysics,by the question of regularity in the sense of frequency.This is obvious in its immediate attitude toward particular phe-nomena as well as in its attitude toward lawfulness. If, for exam-ple,one show a film of a concrete incident in the behavior of a cer-tain child,the first question of the psychologist usually is: "Do all children do that,or is it at least common ?" And if one must an-swer this question in the negative the behavior involved loses for that psychologist all or almost all claim to scientific interest. To pay attention to such an "exceptional case" seems to him a scien-tifically unimportant bit of folly.
The real attitude of the investigator toward particular events and the problem of individuality is perhaps more clearly expressed in this actual behavior than in many theories. The individual event seems to him fortuitous, unimportant, scientifically indifferent. It may,however,be some extraordinary event,some tremendous ex-perience,something that has critically determined the destiny of the person involved,or the appearance of an historically significant personality. In such a case it is customary to emphasize the "mys-tical" character of all individuality and originality,comprehensible only to "intuition," or at least not to science.
Both of these attitudes toward the particular event lead to the same conclusion: that that which does not occur repeatedly lies outside the realm of the comprehensible. La'w fuLness as Frequency. The esteem in which frequency is held in present-day psychology is due to the fact that it is still considered a question whether, and if so how far, the psychical world is lawful,just as in Aristotelian physics this esteem was due to a similar uncertainty about lawfulness in the physical world. It is not necessary here to describe at length the vicissitudes of the thesis of the lawfulness of the psychic in philosophical discussion. It is sufficient to recall that even at present there arc many tend-encies to limit the operation of law to certain "lower" spheres of psychical events. For us it is more important to note that the field which is considered lawful, not in principle,but in the actual re-search of psychology-even of experimental psychology-has only been extended very gradually. If psychology has only very gradu-ally and hesitantly pushed beyond the bounds of sensory psychol-ogy into the fields of will and affect,it is certainly due not only to technical difficulties,but mainly to the fact that in this field actual repetition,a recurrence of the same event,is not to be expected. And this repetition remains,as it did for Aristotle,to a large ex-tent the basis for the assumption of the lawfulness or intelligibili-ty of an event.
……