本研究以讀寫結(jié)合寫作任務(wù)為測(cè)試工具(該測(cè)試項(xiàng)目效度已在相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)中得以驗(yàn)證),所收集數(shù)據(jù)包括:受試寫作文本、問卷調(diào)查、有聲思維及回溯性訪談錄音。本研究的創(chuàng)新之處體現(xiàn)在:1)本研究推導(dǎo)、驗(yàn)證EFL綜合性寫作測(cè)試項(xiàng)目受試策略運(yùn)用框架,從多個(gè)維度探討受試認(rèn)知策略、元認(rèn)知策略和意義建構(gòu)策略使用及其對(duì)讀寫能力的影響,在語言測(cè)試領(lǐng)域具有一定的創(chuàng)新價(jià)值;2)本研究在相關(guān)理論框架和前人研究基礎(chǔ)之上構(gòu)建讀寫任務(wù)認(rèn)知策略、元認(rèn)知策略、意義構(gòu)建策略調(diào)查工具,并通過實(shí)證研究對(duì)其進(jìn)行信度、效度的檢驗(yàn),使其具備較強(qiáng)的可操作性,這對(duì)于探究綜合性英語寫作測(cè)試與教學(xué)中受試如何使用策略,教師如何以此為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行有效反饋提供了有益借鑒。
1997-2001 西北師范大學(xué) 獲學(xué)士學(xué)位(英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè));
2001-2004 蘭州大學(xué) 碩士研究生 (英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè));
2012-2015 上海外國(guó)語大學(xué) 博士研究生(英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè));
2004年至今任職于上海第二工業(yè)大學(xué)外國(guó)語學(xué)院。
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1 Rationale for the study
1.2 Significance of the study
1.3 Outline of the study
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Mental operations in writing
2.1.1 Cognitive operations in writing
2.1.2 Metacognition
2.1.3 Metacognitive strategies in writing
2.2 Constructivist discourse synthesis
2.2.1 Organizing
2.2.2 Selecting
2.2.3 Connecting
2.3 Studies on integrated tasks
2.3.1 Merits and problems of integrated writing tasks
2.3.2 Product-focused studies of integrated test tasks ...
2.3.3 Process-focused studies of integrated test tasks ...
2.4 Elicitation of strategy use
2.4.1 Self-scoring questionnaires
2.4.2 Interviews
2.4.3 Think-aloud protocols
2.4.4 Journals
2.5 Research hypothesis and research questions
2.5.1 Research hypothesis
2.5.2 Research questions
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 A mixed-method approach——triangulation
3.2 Participants
3.2.1 Participants of the quantitative study
3.2.2 Participants of the qualitative study
3.3 Data collection
3.3.1 Measurement instruments
3.3.2 Questionnaire data
3.3.3 Think Aloud Protocols
3.3.4 Follow-up interviews
3.4 Data analysis
3.4.1 MFRM analysis of test scores
3.4.2 Factor analysis of questionnaire data
3.4.3 TAP data analysis
3.5 Summary
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS
4.1 Multi-Faceted Rasch measurement
4.1.1 The vertical rulers
4.1.2 Examinee measurement report
4.1.3 Raters' rating quality
4.1.4 Item measurement report
4.1.5 Summary
4.2 Item-level questionnaire data analyses
4.2.1 The meaning-constructing strategy use questionnaire
4.2.2 The metacognitive strategy use questionnaire
4.2.3 The cognitive strategy use questionnaire
4.3 Confirmatory factor analysis
4.4 Qualitative data analyses
4.4.1 Meaning-constructing strategy use
4.4.2 Metacognitive strategy use
4.4.3 Cognitive strategy use
4.4.4 Summary
4.5 Summary of the chapter
CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION
5.1 Nature of subjects' reported strategy use
5.1.1 Meaning-constructing strategy use
5.1.2 Metacognitive strategy use
5.1.3 Cognitive strategy use
5.2 Differences in strategy use across performance levels
5.2.1 Subjects' source use
5.2.2 Metacogntive strategy use
5.2.3 Cognitive strategy use
5.3 Summary
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION
6.1 Summary of the main findings
6.2 Implications
6.2.1 Theoretical implications
6.2.2 Pedagogical implications
6.2.3 Methodological implications
6.3 Limitations
6.4 Future research directions
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
INDEX
POSTSCRIPT